In Poor Economics and Freakonomics
we learned that the conventional wisdom is not always the truth. What seemed like logical
and probable conclusions often are not. Could this be the case with unemployment
insurance?
Unemployment is one of the most relevant,
studied and debated topics in the U.S economy today. It is a major
measurement of how our economy is preforming. Unemployment rates have reached great heights
in the last few years and have been the main focus of most policy makers and
economists. Having said that, I thought now would be an interesting time more
than ever to see what really helps the unemployed find employment and what
hinders them.
The benefits from unemployment
insurance come in the form of payments made by the government to people who
register themselves as unemployed. These
benefits act on a timeline, and at a certain point, their beneficiaries stop
receiving them. In the application
process to receive benefits from unemployment insurance, recipients must state
that they will seek work and provide proof of current employment
While unemployment insurance seems
like a good way for the government to bring financial stability to the
unemployed, could it also be creating disincentives for the unemployed to find
work? Or put differently, could monetary handouts cause the unemployed to have
an incentive to stay unemployed for a longer duration of time? This is the question I am hoping to answer
through my research.
The policy implications might be
that maybe the government should create other incentives besides monetary ones
for the unemployed. Maybe giving
handouts isn’t the right way to motivate discouraged workers and that in fact it promotes
unemployment.
Most of the data I have found so far on this
topic are of a micro-economic sort. One
of the data sets shows the relationship between persons unemployed for 27 weeks as a percentage of total unemployment. This data set should give me a good idea of
the average duration of unemployment.
Another data set that should be informative about the duration of
employment is on the average duration vs. the total U.S unemployment annual
rate. For data about unemployment
benefits I will look at a set of data that shows the average duration of
unemployment of persons collecting unemployment insurance benefits. Most of this data dates back from 1970 - 1950
to 2012.
What might make estimating the
affects of unemployment insurance on the duration of unemployment difficult is
the amount of other factors that might go into the job search. I imagine it would be difficult to account for
psychological factors in my regression model such as the presence of mental
barriers like being discouraged. Also
during recessions, when the demand for labor becomes much smaller, it might be harder to see if unemployment insurance
really has an effect.
Mason--I think this is an excellent introduction to your topic. It might also be useful to think about who is becoming unemployed by sector. You mention recessions, but recall that recessions affect different sectors in different ways. How might differential effects by sector help or hurt your analysis?
ReplyDelete