The more I read about UI (unemployment
insurance) the more I learn about how simple but unseen underlying incentives
can cause a policy to work in opposition to its intention. As a policy maker it would seem that
helping people achieve financial stability by allocating money to them while
they are suffering the financial stresses of unemployment is a humane and
rational thing to do. But what I
have come to understand so far in my research is that government payments
create dependency. Simply giving
people money destroys the incentive to make money on their own.
The title of the article, “Is Unemployment Insurance Addictive?, is self explanatory as to the thesis of the argument. The author uses research called
“occurrence dependence” where he looks at whether using unemployment insurance
in the past causes the unemployed to use the insurance more in the future, or
simply put, is it addictive? Through using data and creating regression models
he finds that there is a positive correlation between past and future claims of
unemployment insurance.
Before
reading this article I had not thought about unemployment insurance in terms of
“occurrence dependence”. In my
thesis I focused on whether using unemployment insurance increases the duration
of unemployment but not its affect of increasing future uses of UI.
It also brought to light an
interesting theory as to why this addiction might form. The author said there is a stigma about
unemployment insurance, but once an unemployed worker receives UI for the first
time, the stigma goes away and they continue to use the insurance more
frequently. He also argues that
when the unemployed use UI they learn more about the program and find the
process of receiving UI to be very easy which gives them an incentive to use it
more.
The author’s regression line is
different than mine because he is using the duration of UI as his dependent
variable while I am looking at the duration of unemployment as my dependent
variable. He also made his
regression an exponential one due to that fact that UI durations cannot be less
than 0. I am interested to see if
this would work for my regression as well.
Corak, Miles. 1993. Is
unemployment insurance addictive? evidence from the benefit durations of repeat
users. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47 (1) (10): 62-72.
No comments:
Post a Comment